I want to give Harriet Miers the benefit of the doubt. I really do. That tends to be my naturally ingrained approach to almost all people in almost all circumstances. One of those wishy-washy liberal things, I suppose.
But Give Me A Break. The Senate Judiciary Committe has returned her judicial questionnaire and asked for more information, stating that her responses were "inadequate," "insufficient," and "insulting."
Contrary to popular opinion as generated by prime time television, what lawyers mostly do is write. Voluminous amounts of writing. They do that after they have done their research (or gotten someone to do it for them). Voluminous amounts of research. It's understandable that television viewers may not be aware of this basic fact of lawyer life, because a television show depicting lawyers doing much of what lawyers actually do would be insufferably boring. However, the sad reality is that most lawyers are not sexy babes in short skirts arguing dramatic cases before curmudgeonly judges. Most lawyers are scrunched up behind a computer with stacks of papers and books sliding off all available surfaces as they try to make enough sense of conflicting arguments to create cogent ones of their own.
So how embarrassing is it that a lawyer would produce written work that is characterized as inadequate, insufficient and insulting? Let me count the ways.
No, on second thought, that would be one of those boring lawyer activities.
Ms. Miers, however, SHOULD be engaged in boring lawyer activities. She needs to convince the rest of us that, should she make it to the court, she will be capable of developing and writing an opinion.
Not lookin' good so far.
5 comments:
I can only hope that your take is accurate and that W sees the error of his ways on this one. The big concern then becomes who else he might nominate to replace her. Those of us who value independent intelligent thinking (that preferably agrees with our own views) can only shudder at the thought of the next, even more conservative "Stepford Wife" nominee.
Amen. A lawyer who doesn't have some kind of paper trail obviously hasn't been "lawyering." I can't get over her gushing opinion of Bush. That's what's really really scary.
Jackie
You won't get any argument from me... Lisa :-]
Have you seen the comic strip, "Candorville?" He has a story line about the president nominating a log to the Supreme Court, and the log being voted in. Scary indeed.
Look what happened when Rove wasn't looking. Heaven knows what might happen if he starts paying attention again. Roll on 2008, sez I.
Vicky
http://www.livejournal.com/users/vxv789/
All of it is such a joke. It is unexplainable how much that group of cronies are getting away with. I just wish America would wake up!
Post a Comment