Sunday, October 16, 2005

Unearthing Church History

We are having such a good time in our adult education program at church this year.  Today a local professor of religious studies spoke about the earliest church fathers; next week she is coming back to talk about Augustine, the one whose tracks we follow.  Most Christians, of whatever ilk, have little awareness of just how extensive our reliance on Augustinian formulations is -- much of what we take as "gospel" truth first came from his pen in the 4th and 5th centuries. 

"Early church fathers?" -- a term that referred first to bishops considered to be direct successors in the apolostic chain from Christ and his original followers but was expanded over the first few centuries CE to include all members of the clergy, it also refers to a select group of early writers.  Most of them, interestingly, were in what today we would call the Eastern Church: Northern Africa and the Mideast.  Many of the struggles over early church doctine had to do with the fact that these men were writing in Greek, a much less precise language than Latin.  And since they were inheritors of the Greek as well as the Christian tradition, the footprints of Plato are sprinkled liberally over early Christian writings.

One of the early debates was whether God had in fact created Christ -- whether there was ever a time when Christ was not.  The Nicene Creed, which many of us repeat in church on many Sundays during the year (and in which we proclaim that Jesus is "eternally begotten of the Father, begotten and not made"), is basically the fourth century formulation of the argument against those who set forth the position that there was a time when the Son was not.  (The debate is known as the Arian Controversy, thanks to Arius, the chief proponent of the losing side.)

We also touched on the development of Trinitarian Christianity.  Contrary to casual Protestant belief (and Protestants like to think that we rely on upon the Bible -- sola scriptura, in the words of Martin Luther -- rather than on the Roman Catholic amalgamation of scripture and tradition), there is no articulation of the doctrine of the Trinity in the Bible.  While all three persons of God appear in the Bible, the co-equal status and relationship among Creator, Son, and Spirit was worked out in the council debates of the third and fourth centuries. 

In other words, we Protestants, regardless of what we might want to think, descend from the traditions of our ancestors in the fairth just as our Catholic brothers and sisters do.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

That sounds like a fascinating class.  So many Protestants are amazingly ignorant about church history and want to deny that our roots are as Catholic as they are Biblical.

Anonymous said...

Hard as it is for us to believe, there were riots in the streets of Constantinople over the relationship between God and Jesus. Sounds like a wonderful class.

Jackie

Anonymous said...

I like the study of religion. I should go take some classes on various religions, the history of them and such. I like learning all kinds.

Ari

Anonymous said...

Speaking as one who was brought up Catholic and then "converted" to Pentecostalism...  At first, the pure, simple, "biblical truth" embraced by Pentecostalism seemed much easier to deal with than all the dogma, history, and tradition that constituted the Catholic Church.  It was when you realized that the bible could be "literally" interpreted as many ways as there were people doing the interpreting, that the dogma and the tradition suddenly seemed...more simple.  The end result, for me, was that neither direction was wholly satisfying...  

Anonymous said...

I would like to read more about Augustine.   I'd also like to take this class - wow!  

Have you focussed at all on the role of women in the early church?    In the very early church, right after the time of Christ, there were some with strong roles but that gradually changed as they discovered the need to fit into a patriarchial society.

Anonymous said...

Yes, one of our first classes was on women in the early Jesus movement.  I guess I never wrote about that one.  Or maybe I did.  Women were quite prominent, but their roles were marginalized and their history quickly suppressed as the church try to accomodate itself and its writings to the demands of the Roman Empire.  The books that Paul actually wrote indicate inclusiveness of women at all levels.  The books attributed to him that he didn't actually write contain the later, more rigid prescriptions with reference to women

Anonymous said...

Whenever I read one of your entries on church history I realize how much I don't know about other religions.  In fact, it makes me wonder if I know nearly as much history of my own religion as I should.

Anonymous said...

    Amen. This is facinating.
Jude
http://journals.aol.com/jmorancoyle/MyWay

Anonymous said...

I like Augustine's approach. Live it up while you're young, then turn into a paragon of virtue and develop a code of morality for everyone else. I play up the Augustinian journey aspect of Crime and Punishment.

I know...my typical fly in the ointment comment. Sooooooooorry, Robin.